A former professional from a long-running dance competition series has delivered a series of pointed critiques on the show’s latest season. The remarks, made during a recent podcast appearance, covered a wide range of performers, mixing sharp criticism with measured praise.
The dancer, a multi-season veteran and former champion, questioned whether a frontrunner truly held the top position, suggesting another contestant was the season’s real pacesetter. He did, however, acknowledge the frontrunner’s significant improvement and potential to win.
His commentary extended to technical execution. He described one celebrity’s contemporary routine as lacking polish, attributing it to insufficient coaching, while labeling another professional’s foundational technique as so poor it called their qualification into question. A rumba performed by a highly-regarded pro was deemed too traditional and a letdown for the competition’s level.
Amid the critiques, several performances earned his approval. He commended one pair for a well-executed number, describing the celebrity’s performance as nearly flawless in its own right. He lavished praise on another contestant, calling their jazz routine worthy of a Broadway standing ovation, and declared a different celebrity his personal favorite of the evening, highlighting their compelling stage presence.
The analysis also highlighted an “unbelievable” performance from another contestant, suggesting only the routine’s finish prevented a full standing ovation. Finally, he acknowledged the clear effort and passion behind another dance, stating he had no further notes despite not scoring it a perfect ten.
The unvarnished feedback provides a rare, insider’s perspective on the technical and artistic demands of the competition as it progresses.
