A 2006 gathering at a Windsor royal residence has come under renewed scrutiny, as it has been confirmed that three individuals later convicted of serious crimes were present as guests. The event, a private celebration, was held just weeks after one of the attendees had become the subject of an international arrest warrant.
Previously, it was understood the individuals had only attended a larger, official function at Windsor Castle. However, recent analysis of photographic evidence indicates they also visited the private royal residence beforehand. This visit occurred a mere eight days before one of the guests was taken into custody in the United States.
When later questioned about the association, the royal host stated he was unaware of the legal proceedings against his guest at the time the invitation was extended, claiming knowledge only came later through media reports.
The residence itself has been the subject of significant public debate. The Duke has lived there for over two decades under a unique financial arrangement. Official records show a substantial upfront payment was made for a long-term lease, with subsequent renovations treated as prepaid rent. This structure has resulted in minimal annual costs for the occupant.
This arrangement has prompted questions, particularly as the Duke no longer receives a personal allowance from the sovereign or public funding. Observers have raised pointed inquiries about how the ongoing and considerable maintenance of the estate is managed without a clear source of income.
The situation is further complicated by ongoing discussions about the future of the property. Reports indicate the Duke is reluctant to leave and is involved in negotiations regarding alternative accommodations. He has expressed interest in one recently vacated cottage, while his former spouse is said to be considering another nearby property.
These potential moves are tied to a broader reshuffling of royal households in the Windsor area, with another senior royal family expected to relocate to a larger historic home on the estate. A source familiar with the discussions noted that the proposed alternative homes, while separate, are in close proximity, allowing the family to remain connected.
