A once-close bond between two high-profile real estate agents has publicly disintegrated, revealing a rift centered on romantic allegiances and fundamental personal beliefs.
The friendship, which blossomed after one joined the cast of a popular real estate reality series, was previously described in glowing terms. One party had even stated she trusted the other “with my whole heart,” sharing details of her life as one would with family.
The fracture began to show surrounding the other’s on-again, off-again relationship with a real estate developer. The friend voiced strong disapproval, later citing deeply concerning statements allegedly made by the partner. These remarks reportedly included derogatory comments about gender pronouns, the use of racial slurs, and comparisons between nonbinary identity and mental illness.
“I have a deep core issue with people who think that way,” the friend stated, clarifying that her own partner is nonbinary. “It was upsetting. I found real things to be dangerous with his personality.”
The conflict escalated significantly after a final joint public appearance. When directly questioned by a fan about the status of their friendship, the disapproval was laid bare. The friend pointedly referenced the partner’s alleged political affiliations and offensive language as the breaking point, concluding, “I just can’t with that. Too old to allow that in. But love her from afar.”
The ensuing feud became a central storyline in the latest season of their reality show, featuring tense conversations and a refusal to share personal updates about the contentious relationship. The partner was accused of presenting a different persona on-camera than in private and of making legal threats.
The rift reached its peak during a filmed reunion special. While one offered an apology for a specific label used, the other accused her former friend of instigating a wave of online harassment by publicly associating her with the partner’s views.
“You are attacking my character by associating me with a person that I was struggling with,” was the pointed rebuttal.
The very public dissolution of this friendship underscores how diverging core values and loyalties can unravel even the strongest of bonds, leaving former confidantes as distant acquaintances.
