A Windsor property occupied by a senior royal was the site of a gathering in 2006 that included individuals later convicted or accused of serious crimes. The meeting took place just prior to a major birthday celebration held at the nearby castle.
According to an analysis of photographic evidence, the individuals visited the royal residence before attending a masked party at Windsor Castle. This event occurred mere weeks after legal authorities in the United States had issued an arrest warrant for one of the guests concerning allegations of assault.
When questioned in a later television interview about the decision to extend an invitation, the royal resident stated he was unaware of the active warrant at the time. He claimed knowledge only came later through media reports.
The financial arrangements surrounding the occupancy of this Windsor home have been a persistent subject of public scrutiny. Lease documents reveal a substantial upfront payment was made two decades ago, which was structured to cover the long-term cost of occupancy, effectively reducing the annual fee to a nominal amount. This arrangement means the occupying royal could be owed a significant sum if compelled to leave before the lease expires.
This financial setup has led to ongoing questions within establishment circles about how the estate’s considerable maintenance is funded, especially as the occupant no longer receives a personal allowance from the sovereign.
The situation has become more complex with reports that the resident and his former spouse are engaged in negotiations about potential future housing. They are reportedly seeking two separate properties if required to vacate their current home. One property under discussion was previously occupied by another royal couple who stepped back from official duties.
These housing negotiations are occurring concurrently with plans for other senior royals to relocate within the Windsor estate, signaling a period of significant rearrangement among royal households. A source familiar with the discussions noted that the proposed alternative properties, while separate, are in close proximity, allowing for easy contact between the former spouses and visits from their family.
